User blog comment:Wazzupguys/Declaration of New Order/@comment-24839525-20200218121543

Trying not to cause drama but maybe it's for the best that Chris is not a content monitor? I mean it is our job to encourage people to make ideas not to claim they suck and try to remove them. Regardless of if they are good or bad. I'm currently trying to get better at this as I am unsure if Chris is. Trying to say this the most neutral way I can

And maybe if it is poorly written we could have our new organization and design advisor make it less poorly written. The only valid reasons to delete a page is if it is spam, plagiarism or they want it to be deleted. None of this "poorly written" shtick

I'm not saying Chris is anything like "You're annoying, troublemaker, pest, motherfucker, jetk, piece of volcano, killer, assassin, ridiculous,idiot, lawbreaker, sucker, donkey, racist, culprit, death, imitator, traitor, criminal, uncountable, insignificant, loser, villain, destroyer, out of respect, bully, lair, unacceptable, jerk, thief, devilish and of course, Chilean hater." I am just saying that maybe it is best to have a wiki that looks positivitly at ideas and embraces them, not one that removes ideas for not being "good"